But the novel also gives the floor to the ‘Master discourse’: the authoritative voice which apparently knows the truth about the current human condition, articulating a vision of the future, encasing its prophetic messages in intriguing bio-art gadgets. On the other hand, they are tormented individuals, suffering from a range of pathologies and symptoms which allegedly have become endemic in contemporary society (‘hysterical discourse’). On the one hand, the novel’s key characters function as experts (representing expertise in academic research fields such as molecular life science, global health policy and cultural studies), giving voice to what Lacan refers to as ‘university discourse’. Notably, I will employ Lacan’s ‘four discourses’ to assess the various roles and positions that determine its basic structure. To bring its cultural relevance to the fore, I will approach the novel from a Lacanian angle. Indeed, I will argue that Inferno may help us to ‘assess the present’ by pointing out what it is we find so intriguing and uncanny about virology and its model organism of choice: the potentially lethal virus. This article reads Dan Brown’s recently published best-seller Inferno not as a cinematic techno-thriller, but as a ‘science novel’: a literary document that allows us to discern some of the tensions, paradoxes and inner dynamics of virology as a contemporary (‘hyper-scientific’) biomedical research field.
0 kommentar(er)
